Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï

SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Posted on July 2nd, 2025 at 2:16 PM
SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï

AdvisorHub reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has finalized a recommendation urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to rein in the use of mandatory arbitration clauses by registered investment advisers (“RIA”s). After raising concerns over two years ago, the committee voted to formally advise the SEC to improve fairness and transparency in how customer disputes are handled.

The recommendation outlines four key actions. First, the SEC should align arbitration standards for RIAs with existing Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules governing broker-dealers. Those rules prohibit class action waivers and require arbitration hearings to take place near the client’s residence.

Second, RIAs should notify clients of any mandatory arbitration clauses and disclose arbitration outcomes. The committee also called for a requirement that RIAs include arbitration provisions within their Form ADV disclosures. Third, the SEC should establish a publicly accessible, searchable database of arbitration awards for RIAs, similar to FINRA’s existing arbitration records and BrokerCheck disclosures for broker-dealers.

Finally, the committee urged the SEC to investigate RIA arbitration practices further and produce educational resources to help investors understand arbitration procedures and identify key questions to raise with their advisers.

As reported by AdvisorHub, the recommendations follow a 2023 study examining 579 advisory agreements. The findings revealed that 61 percent contained mandatory arbitration clauses, with several including troubling provisions — such as requiring customers to bear arbitration costs, limiting potential damages, or restricting types of claims. Notably, 97 percent of these agreements failed to factor in the client’s location when selecting hearing venues.

Although the Investor Advisory Committee does not set regulatory policy, it made clear that applying consistent arbitration protections across both investment advisers and brokerage firms aligns with an adviser’s fiduciary duty to act in the client’s best interest, according to AdvisorHub.

 

ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

I have the best legal firm in the country to defend me. Awesome job!

Cindy C.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1783615970 Law
July 9, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Branch Manager for Supervisory Failures Linked to Excessive Trading and Churning

A former regional branch manager at a broker-dealer has agreed to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctions after the regulator found that he failed to supervise registered representatives who engaged in excessive trading and churning of customer accounts.

1783525964 Law
July 8, 2026
SEC Sanctions David Lerner Associates for Regulation Best Interest Violations

David Lerner Associates has agreed to settle Securities and Exchange (SEC) charges alleging violations of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) that resulted in unnecessary costs to retail investors, according to InvestmentNews.

1783434190 Law
July 7, 2026
Private Credit Funds Face Mounting Redemption Pressure as Investor Sentiment Shifts

A surge in investor redemption requests has intensified pressure on private credit funds, raising concerns about liquidity and long-term stability across the asset class, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.