Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï

Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

Posted on May 23rd, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï

A federal judge has rejected a proposed $40 million class-action settlement with Vanguard, finding that the deal offered little to no real value to harmed investors compared to a separate settlement the firm reached with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), according to Barron’s.

The dispute originated after corporate retirement plans moved out of Vanguard’s target-date funds in favor of lower-cost institutional options. This shift left retail investors with unexpected capital gains tax liabilities. Vanguard initially agreed to settle the resulting class action for $40 million, allocating over $13 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. The U.S. District Court had granted preliminary approval of the settlement before new facts emerged.

Around the same time, Vanguard entered into a $135 million remediation agreement with the SEC and several state regulators for the same conduct. Notably, that agreement allowed Vanguard to reduce its SEC payment by $40 million if the court approved the class settlement. In effect, Vanguard’s total payout remained $135 million, but approval of the class settlement would divert a significant portion of the sum to attorneys’ fees, reducing the investors’ recovery.

As reported by Barron's, the court called this a “strange situation” and highlighted that rejecting the class settlement would result in a greater recovery for the investors through the SEC fund-- without deductions for legal fees and without requiring class members to waive any claims.

Following additional argument and briefing, Judge Murphy concluded that the proposed class settlement was neither fair, reasonable, nor adequate. He noted that approval would have primarily benefitted Vanguard and class counsel at the expense of the investors. By rejecting the deal, the court preserved investors' rights and guaranteed them at least the same financial recovery through the SEC agreement. 

The court has ordered the parties to file a status report by May 30.

ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: Eccleston, ÍøÆØ³Ô¹Ï

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

I am grateful to have found an outstanding law firm that specializes in securities matters. My lawyers were extremely knowledgeable, diligent, and are skilled litigators. No stone was left upturned. As a result of their experience and tenacity, the arbitration proceeding was dismissed in my favor.

Michael E.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1783615970 Law
July 9, 2026
FINRA Suspends Former Branch Manager for Supervisory Failures Linked to Excessive Trading and Churning

A former regional branch manager at a broker-dealer has agreed to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctions after the regulator found that he failed to supervise registered representatives who engaged in excessive trading and churning of customer accounts.

1783525964 Law
July 8, 2026
SEC Sanctions David Lerner Associates for Regulation Best Interest Violations

David Lerner Associates has agreed to settle Securities and Exchange (SEC) charges alleging violations of Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) that resulted in unnecessary costs to retail investors, according to InvestmentNews.

1783434190 Law
July 7, 2026
Private Credit Funds Face Mounting Redemption Pressure as Investor Sentiment Shifts

A surge in investor redemption requests has intensified pressure on private credit funds, raising concerns about liquidity and long-term stability across the asset class, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.